| Newsroom For Immediate Release
Groups demand new environmental assessment of revised massive open-pit coal mine on doorstep of Jasper National Park
Under
the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the federal
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is required
to assess major project modifications before issuing
any approval, said Sierra Club of Canada's Dianne Pachal. It's critical that DFO take a fresh look at the project because the nature
of the project has fundamentally changed along with
its environmental impacts. On behalf of the Canadian Nature Federation
(CNF), Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development,
Jasper Environmental Association, Alberta Wilderness
Association and the Sierra Club of Canada, Sierra
Legal Defence Fund applied for a Judicial Review
at the Federal Court late last week.
Although the initial construction of the mine is underway, no federal authorizations have been issued. The groups argue that, as a result, there is no mechanism to implement the mitigation measures the federal government assured Canadians would be in place to lessen the mine's significant adverse impacts. The original project would have processed the
raw coal on site, however the new project includes
expanding the mine area to take in the McLeod River
valley and the construction of a high-speed, 24-hour
haul road along its length to truck raw coal 22
km north to the Luscar Mine for processing. It is the very development the company had earlier ruled out
due to social and environmental impacts and technological
limitations. The proposed high-speed road between Luscar
and Cheviot would act as an impassable barrier for
wildlife and would also impact fish and migratory
bird habitat, said Glen
Semenchuk from CNF. DFO has a legal duty to examine all of the modifications to
the project, as well as a duty to ensure that mitigation
measures are implemented. Cardinal River Coals originally proposed the
massive open-pit mine in 1996. A federal-provincial
review panel subsequently examined the proposal
and found that the project would negatively impact
fish and fish habitat, migratory birds, the terrain,
First Nations' traditional uses of the area and
those people seeking wildlands.
The adverse impacts included two species
designated as Îat risk' by the Committee on the
Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC)
Ò the grizzly bear and harlequin duck.
Despite these impacts, the panel recommended
that DFO approve the project, as they concluded
the jobs and coal production would outweigh the
environmental losses. However, the groups note that the
new project, while requiring a larger area, will
mine less than half the coal and employ only a quarter
to half the people of the earlier project. Previously, Sierra Legal successfully challenged
the panel's 1997 findings and DFO's approval on
behalf of several citizens' groups. In 2000, after further review, the joint review panel issued
a second report, again recommending approval of
the Cheviot project. However, that project was not
developed and in August 2002 Cardinal River Coal
launched the modified Cheviot project. The
case is expected to be heard in early 2005.
-30- For further information please contact:
|




















